Are people that work in the industry of psychiatry and eugenics really that stupid to suppose that their dirty medical science would never be brought out into public light and made clear as to what the end goals of eugenicists and psychiatrists are?

In 1921 the eminent Jewish-British biologist and eugenicist Redcliffe Salaman (1874-1955) predicted before the Second International Conference of Eugenics that chances were 100 to 1 that the “little bright eyed Jewish lad hawking newspapers in his ragged clothes” in London’s East End would “better himself” if only given the chance thanks to his natural ability. Although Salaman’s prediction has proven remarkably accurate, his viewpoint is vehemently attacked nowadays by a veritable eugenics bashing industry, most of it Jewish. Who are these opponents of eugenics and what motivates them? The very subtitle of Jewish- American historian Sander Gilman’s 1996 book Smart Jews: The Construction of the Image of Jewish Superior Intelligence rejects the concept of Jewish intelligence as a ‘construct,’ that is, something invented and not based on reality. And even though the majority of Jews agree with Salaman and disagree with Gilman, it is Gilman’s opinion that currently carries the day in the popular media. In the third volume of Who Are the Jews? entitled Fatal Gift: Jewish Intelligence and Western Civilization, Jewish-American historian and eugenicist Seymour Itzkoff (b. 1928) takes issue with this point of view in general and with Gilman specifically, whom he dismisses as “a representative example of a newer kind of self-hating Jew, a denier of the objective reality of Jewish intelligence, even when it stands before us universally in evidence in the scientific and historical record”: Can we ever resolve the dilemmas posed by history as well as our own fragile civilizational existence if we refute fact and truth in favor of momentarily salving mythologies? Here is the essential tragedy of the Holocaust. Had Western civilization been able to proclaim the truth that Jewish accomplishment was not part of a sinister conspiracy to take over the world, here a people apart, tainted with peculiar cultural traditions, could we not have been able to stop the insanity of ‘National Socialism’ and the other pseudo-egalitarian crusades against human accomplishment? The topic is thoroughly covered in Richard Lynn’s The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievements.

The evils works of eugenics science taken out and forced on the innocent and defenseless. Shame on you people for what you have done and still continue to do to the masses

Negative eugenics, which is aimed at lowering fertility among the genetically disadvantaged, largely fits under the rubric of family planning and genetic counseling. This includes contraception, abortions, and sterilization. To ensure that such services are available to all on a nondiscriminatory basis, it is advocated that, at a minimum, persons with low income receive such services, free of charge.
     Genetic engineering, which was unknown to early eugenicists, consists of active intervention in the germ line without necessarily encouraging or discouraging reproduction of advantaged or disadvantaged individuals. It will allow people to have their own biological children without passing on their most problematic genes.
     National family policy provides a good illustration of how a eugenics policy might be implemented. A government can opt either to offer subsidized day care to all women, permitting those wishing to work the opportunity to pursue their careers (according to eugenicists, a praiseworthy approach), or it can subsidize only poor women, many of whom are thus encouraged to view childbearing as a source of income (according to eugenicists, a dysgenic approach).
     Another example is presented by the starkly different positions of the U.S. and Canadian governments on immigration. The United States imports the underclass of other countries to ‘do jobs Americans don’t want to do,’ while Canada, whose immigrants are easily just as ethnically diverse as are America’s, rates immigration applicants accord- ing to educational levels and skills, which correlate highly with intelligence.
     Simultaneous with and analogous to China’s Cultural Revolution in the 1960s, an ideological upheaval arrived in America as a denial of Darwinism, declaring eugenics to be the ideology of Holocaust. As the timeline demonstrates, for Jews, who had practiced eugenics for millennia, it was a repudiation of their own history.
     The squandering of a group’s genetic patrimony is not by any means an exclusively Jewish affliction. Humankind’s elites are generally disappearing. Economists study human fertility in terms of cost-benefit analysis. Children are no longer the economic advantage they once were when the economy centered around agriculture.
     As opposed to its two universalist heresies – Christianity and Islam – traditional Judaism is an explicitly tribalist religion, but as Jews left the ghetto and were subsumed by modern secular culture, they attempted to reconcile tribalism with universalism, creating an internal tension which still rives Jewry today.     The resolution of this tension was found in America in the 1960s and 1970s in the form of ‘multiculturalism.’