Disrespecting me is like disrespecting the Devil, since the devil always wins between human beings and the level of difficulty of a game’s win outcome, or desired output manipulation. The playing field is simply just not level, or fair.

Disrespecting me is disrespecting the Devil, since the devil always wins between human  beings and the level of difficulty of the game’s win outcome or desired output manipulation.  The playing field is simple just not level or fair.

,and,the,level,of,difficulty,of,the,game’s,win,outcome,or,desired,output,manipulation,The,playing,field,is,simple,just,not,level,or,fair

Information about the Illuminati click here

These are the worst types of human beings that have ever existed; psychologists and psychiatrists

x

     Psychologists and psychiatrists are both of the types of individuals of whom suffer from control issues, deep seated resentments towards their fellow human beings, issues with rage disorder, symptoms of paranoia that are directly linked to their past experiences, and suffer from several other mental disorders that are listed and defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

     These are not the type of people that you want to have as friends or meet for the first time, or go out on a date with.  You will want to avoid these types of people at all costs, since they not only are they distributive types of people, but they also a considerable threat to society.

Information about the Illuminati click here

Listed here are major crimes against the most vulnerable human beings

While the White House encourages sweeping mental health information programs that will lead to increased drugging, the Vatican is looking into the destructive end-result of mental health diagnosing, spearheading an investigational conference into the harmful effects of prescription psychiatric drugs.

Young people are especially vulnerable when in the care of the state, because of abuse by the mental health care system, especially massive psychiatric drugging.

The NY Times reports on a study in journal Pediatrics about massive drugging of young people in USA foster care homes, especially with so-called "antipsychotic" drugs also known as neuroleptics.  Some Texas foster kids' doctors have ties to drug firms.

A mainstream Texas newspaper examines the massive, profitable and illegal psychiatric drugging of children in Texas foster care.

The US Congress held a public hearing about the way youth in foster care are often given large amounts of powerful psychiatric drugs, without adequate oversight, accountability, information, alternatives and advocacy.  Vera Sharav of Alliance for Human Research Protection issued this report.  USA legislator McDermott holds hearings on foster care psychiatric drugging.

Hearings are being held in US Congress on 8 May 2008 about the abuse of foster care youth by psychiatric drugging.

USA Today did a series about psychiatric drugging of youth, including this on the foster care controversy.

The largest daily newspaper in Oregon published a three-part investigation of the the massive psychiatric drugging of youth in foster care in Oregon.

Alliance for Human Research Protection reports about a Texas Foster Care Investigation issued in 2004 by Texas comptroller, Carole Keeton Strayhorn.  Children as young as three are drugged with neuroleptics.

Youth in foster and group homes are often given psychiatric drugs, including "polypharmacy" -- a chemical cocktail of multiple psychiatric drugs -- according to this study published by the American Psychiatric Association.

Eugenics in America; war on the weak

Politics generally amounts to the horizontal struggle between organized groups and wealthy individuals in the pursuit of their real or perceived interests. By contrast, eugenics represents a vertical effort – lobbying for the genetic patrimony of future generations. Unaccustomed to protests on behalf of this as yet nonexistent group, those of us who are currently breathing generally find it more comforting to proceed from an assumption of human particularism. Philosopher David Heyd of the Hebrew University writes of the purported “rift between the human and the natural”: while animals are viewed as being instinct driven in a positivist sense, people lay claim to reason and ‘free will.’ But once the recognition is made of the continuity of humanity with other species, it becomes more and more difficult to “characterize humans in contradistinction to other animals,” to use Heyd’s phraseology. That continuity in its turn rests on the recognition of causality, as opposed to intervention by deity. Based as it is on a theory of human particularism, the “software heresy” of egalitarianism must be able to stand up to the piercing gaze of scientific observation and thus is doomed to at least partial failure, but at what point exactly does the half full glass suddenly become half empty? The twentieth century can be divided into thirds: the first third being one of eugenic utopian thought, the second one of reassessment, with the last third dominated by an anti-hereditarian utopianism. Eugenicists believe that since we now understand the mechanism of evolution and know that human beings are a biological species, the road to perfection is clearly laid out along the lines of scientific selection. In this sense, eugenicists are entirely accurate in their appraisal of humankind, but unrealistic in their assumption that humans are rational and altruistic enough to implement this knowledge for the good of distant ‘future generations.’ By contrast, even those egalitarians (anti-hereditarians) who accept Darwinism assume that evolution has produced only insignificant variance within and between human populations, and evolution has come to a grinding halt for human beings. Thus, utopia is to be found at the end of an environmentally determined rainbow. Essentially, anti-hereditarian egalitarianism is secular religion: if we have been created in the image of God, we are divine too. But ultimately the number of frail links in a chain is meaningless. It snaps whether they are one or many. The current popular assumption is that the normal rules of animal husbandry and population management have little applicability to people. In 1968 Soviet academician Nikolai Dubinin displayed no reticence in