The clinical distinction between neurology and psychiatry is increasingly appreciated as awkward and artificial. Neurology has traditionally focused on organic disorders with identifiable pathology, whereas psychiatry has focused on functional disorders without observable pathology. If one cannot measure something that has the mathematical definition for a particular type of functional disorder defined by the mathematics defining the science of pathology while pathology defines the problems that physicians solve then, obviously physicians cannot solve some problems that are defined by the science of pathology such as the particular problem (e.g. a particular type of functional disorder) is a false English statement for only this sentence because one type of science (for the natural known universe that you and I both currently live in) is pathology. Pathology is a type of science belonging to human bio-medical science. Pathology is the human bio-medical science that defines every disease that any particular person and also to include any person within all 7 billion persons living on earth in the current day of the current (2016 A.D.) year has some possibility of being diagnosed with during their natural human life time duration's' start to end. If any person could get any particular disease defined by a pathologist then, also if any person got a functional disorder treatable with substances found in the natural chemistry of the planet earth prescribed by a physician that specializes in some particular type of psychiatric medicine has the knowledge that functional disorders are not the following: 1); psychiatric disorders are diseases with unidentifiable pathology that are obviously not scientifically observable and, 2); the patho-physiological basis has not been discovered for psychiatric disorders because obviously psychiatric disorders are diseases with unidentifiable pathology that are obviously not scientifically observable. Finally we have shown what we needed to demonstrate, that was contained within every sentence that you have been reading from the very first sentence until this final sentences' end (after the word) here.

The clinical distinction between neurology and psychiatry is increasingly appreciated as awkward and artificial. Neurology has traditionally focused on organic disorders with identifiable pathology, whereas psychiatry has focused on functional disorders without observable pathology. If one cannot measure something that has the mathematical definition for a particular type of functional disorder defined by the mathematics defining the science of pathology while pathology defines the problems that physicians solve then, obviously physicians cannot solve some problems that are defined by the science of pathology such as the particular problem (e.g. a particular type of functional disorder) is a false English statement for only this sentence because one type of science (for the natural known universe that you and I both currently live in) is pathology. Pathology is a type of science belonging to human bio-medical science. Pathology is the human bio-medical science that defines every disease that any particular person and also to include any person within all 7 billion persons living on earth in the current day of the current (2016 A.D.) year has some possibility of being diagnosed with during their natural human life time duration's' start to end. If any person could get any particular disease defined by a pathologist then, also if any person got a functional disorder treatable with substances found in the natural chemistry of the planet earth prescribed by a physician that specializes in some particular type of psychiatric medicine has the knowledge that functional disorders are not the following: 1); psychiatric disorders are diseases with unidentifiable pathology that are obviously not scientifically observable and, 2); the patho-physiological basis has not been discovered for psychiatric disorders because obviously psychiatric disorders are diseases with unidentifiable pathology that are obviously not scientifically observable. Finally we have shown what we needed to demonstrate, that was contained within every sentence that you have been reading from the very first sentence until this final sentences' end (after the word) here.